Brendan & Fred,
Great food for thought.
The Canadian Pedorthic association seems to be more serious about the quality of care and standard of education. Not having worked with many Canadian Cpeds I can only speak of those I have come across in my travels and business dealings but the Canadians seem to have a better understanding of foot function and practical solutions to a given situation. Don't know if this comes from the course they are taught or if I just happen to come across some bright ones.
I realize these comments may make me very unpopular and just like all other aspects of life, there are many exceptions, both to the good and bad side of the argument. These are just my observations, take them as such.
Remember that many come into the field with other backgrounds, doctor, orthotist and prosthetist. They bring a level of knowledge and experience that benefits pedorthics and will make them a much better practitioner than the average Joe who has just finished the course. As much as this helps the profession, the chain is only as weak as it weakest link so by allowing “unqualified” individuals to become certified brings a degree of mediocrity and does little good in bringing the level of the profession up to par.
The attitude Bendan ran into in the early 80s is still commonplace, more so along the old timers. Failure to explain or resistance to be challenged in ones opinions seems common. I think part of the problem in this is the lack of a thorough knowledge of the matter. Making strong statements is easy, being challenged on them and being able to explain them in depth to others requires a lot of in depth knowledge.
For me, I enjoy discussing these matters, there are perspectives out there that are other than my own and there are more than one way to come to a desirable solution. If I an learn from the ways others approach any given issue it makes me better, even if I choose never to use their way.
I like the idea of collaborating on a project either leading up to the AGM in Guthrie or starting something there and continuing through he Colloquy. I am hoping to make it to Guthrie but it's too early for me to make a firm commitment.
Any ideas are welcome on this. If any of the readers / HCC members have anything they would like to see addressed put it up.
Brendan, you asked about my medical training, I was given the opportunity to spend a year long internship in the Massachusetts General Hospital covering podiatry, orthopedic surgery, O&P, radiology, PT and the gait lab. During that time I had the opportunity to take part in all orthopedic surgery and podiatry lectures given in the Harvard Medical School residency program, observe surgeries, mostly ortho & podiatry. During this time I finally got a good understanding of foot function and learned to appreciate many aspects of the gait cycle that brought an understanding going well beyond just having read about it in a book.
One of the most enjoyable memories I have from that time is from the pediatric orthopedic clinic. 85% of the cases coming through there were gait related. The usual intoeing, flat feet, genu valgum / genu varum (knock knees / bow leggedness). Most are normal growth related conditions, as the body grows the bones and soft tissue do not develop a the same rate, causing an imbalance that is projected in the joints. Going crazy trying to correct this is not desirable in the opinion of most doctors. There are situations where there are more than just growth imbalances, those should be addressed. Not all that common but it's really up to a physician to decide when to intervene and to what degree.
Generally I agree with letting children run around barefoot as long as it's out in the grass and on the beach, not on concrete. The runners that run a full marathon barefoot have not worn shoes from the moment they took their first step, they did not grow up with pavement everywhere. Their feet actually function as intended. Once one starts the practice of wearing shoes regularly there is no way back and in our society it's not feasible to go without footwear. (lucky us

)
Brendan, I like your interpretation of the big house. As long as St. Crispin has a voice in the admitting committee there is hope

.
That's going to do it for tonight. Hope I haven't stepped on too many toes, didn't mean to.
Rob